Books

Back to Basic Apologetics: Why the Bible Is Reliable

By Lisa Quintana

Ever since the Garden of Eden, people have been doubting God’s word –
“…did God ‘really’ say…?” (Gen. 3:1; emphasis mine.) As Solomon said in Ecclesiastes, there is nothing new under the sun (Ecc. 1:9.) The same old lies are repeated over the ages.

Today, doubts about the Bible persist vehemently. False claims spread quickly, perpetuated widely by the Internet, about the trustworthiness of the Bible. Instead of going to a pastor or religious leader to ask questions, people use Google. The reliability of the New Testament documents, for example, is highly targeted. The New Testament contains all kinds of miracles, including Jesus rising from the dead. If these accounts are true, then a lot is at stake here. It forces a person to look at their lives under the light of how God says a person should live.

Some of us don’t want to hear that we might be doing things in our lives that are not what God wants of us. Others don’t understand the Bible and the variety of literary styles that it holds, and therefore may misinterpret it because they haven’t been instructed properly on how to read it. Many do not even realize that the Bible is a book written by 40 different authors over a period of more than 1500 years. It is definitely unique and remains the number one best-seller each year despite the naysayers.

Which Bible translation is the “right” one?

A question that is often raised is “How do we know which translation of the Bible is correct since there are so many different translations available?” However, just because there are many translations does not mean that the message has been changed. Bible scholars use the oldest manuscript copies we have and translate directly from those. It’s not some game of “phone tag” where one person says something to the next person and down the line the message gets completely changed. Scholars who study the original Biblical languages (Greek & Hebrew) spend countless hours with teams of people working to accurately translate the Bible in two primary forms: either a “word-for-word” translation (like the NASB), or a thought-for-thought translation (like the Living Bible). These teams of scholars have a checks and balances system to ensure accuracy. Depending on what you prefer, choose a translation that meet your needs. Most “Bible nerds” (like me) like the “word-for-word” translations best, even though they may not read as smoothly as the “thought-for-thought” translations. The word-for-word translations are best for Bible studies involving exegesis.

We don’t have the original autographs, so how can we know that the Bible is accurate?

When scribes wrote copies of the Bible, or any ancient history, the paper they used was not archival. They often wrote on papyrus scrolls that were prone to damage and aging, so many copies were required. This kept scribes busy, and they made a lot of copies over the years. As a matter of fact, the New Testament was the most copied document in ancient history! We have nearly 6,000 manuscripts of the New Testament alone. The only other ancient document that comes close to that is the writings of Homer, with about 2,300 copies. All of these copies are compared with each other to ensure accuracy.

Dr. Dan Wallace is an expert in the field of textual criticism. This field examines the authenticity of ancient documents. For internal evidence, scholars ask:

  1. Who wrote the Gospels? What was their objective in writing them? What sources did the authors use? How reliable were these sources and how far removed in time were these sources from the stories they narrate? Were the sources altered later?
  2. Scholars also consider if the document is misquoting texts from the Hebrew Bible, is making claims about geography that were incorrect, if the author appears to be hiding information or if the author has made up a certain prophecy.

For external evidence, scholars often:

  1. Use ancient sources, including early church leaders.
  2. Consider other writers outside the church (Jewish & Greco-Roman historians) who would have been more likely to have criticized the early churches.
  3. Compare archaeological evidence to the texts.

Wallace says that in addition to the thousands of Greek New Testament manuscripts, there’s over one-million quotations by early church fathers. He says that we could practically reconstruct the New Testament just from these quotations alone.

The two key factors historians use to evaluate the accuracy of ancient texts are:

  1. The number of ancient manuscripts we possess.
  2. The time gap between when the original autographs were written and then when the earliest surviving copies were written.

These two primary factors help determine the accuracy of transmission. For example, the oldest manuscript we have of the New Testament is verified to approximately 117-135 AD. It contains a portion of John 18. This was just decades after the Apostle John’s death, and thus refutes the claim of late authorship.

All of this matters because scholars can reconstruct the originals with copies – manuscripts, remnants, and scrolls. The more copies we have, the better we can reconstruct the originals.

We can be confident that the Gospels have significant manuscript evidence, were written early, and have no variants in them that affect any major doctrine. Yet, skeptics doubt the memory of those who wrote the testimonies.

How can we know that the authors got it right?

It’s important to note that long-term memory is good when events are memorable. The events that happened in Jesus’ ministry are easy to remember, and his disciples learned them well. Rabbis had their disciples sit at their feet, and it was common practice to memorize their teachings. The disciples were with Jesus for three years and heard his teachings more than once. In addition to this, there were eye-witnesses alive at the time the documents were written who could corroborate the Gospel accounts. Most importantly, the Holy Spirit was instrumental in the transmission of the Bible (but skeptics don’t buy this, of course).

Jesus said in John 14:26, “But the Advocate, the Holy Spirit, whom the Father will send in my name, will teach you all things and will remind you of everything I have told you.”

For accuracy of the Old Testament, the discovery of the Dead Sea Scrolls was a remarkable find. These scrolls contain most of the Old Testament, and the entire book of Isaiah, which is 97-99% accurate when compared word-for word to today’s versions. This also refutes the criticism that you can’t trust the Bible because it’s been copied so many times.

Lastly, the Bible is historically accurate as confirmed by archaeology. The website www.biblearchaeology.org is a trusted source for the latest in finds that confirm the historicity of the Bible.

In summary, 

The reliability of the Bible can be known by these methods:

  1. Manuscript evidence (more than any other ancient book)
  2. Written close to the events: Gospels were written within the 1st Century
  3. Dead Sea Scrolls – show that the OT was also accurately copied
  4. Archaeological evidence backing up the historicity of the Bible
  5. Billions of changed lives – including mine!

And anyways, what I always say is that if God can create the universe ex nihilo (out of nothing), it’s “no big thang” for God to inspire people to write His words.

Disclaimer: All views expressed by those associated with this ministry or on our platforms do not necessarily represent the opinions of Women in Apologetics, Inc. or its individual team members.

Share this post

Categories

JOIN THE WIA TRIBE

Become a WIA volunteer and enjoy the many benefits that come with it! Check out our current needs on the volunteer page.

BECOME A KEY PARTNER

Help us in our mission to educate, equip, and encourage women in Christian apologetics.

Copyright © Women in Apologetics. All rights reserved.